Subject	Just under 300hp for NA??? HOW
Posted by	gls22 on November 28, 2001 at 11:01 AM
	This message has been viewed 46 times.
Message	I saw BooZT posting that when his Z was NA,...just under 300 horses,...with what mods,... I am dynoing currently 193rwhp,...will post sheets later today, with the following: apex safc hks intake ur pulley revolution catback exhaust fidanza flywheel mine is a 96,...no ecu,...and I hear headers don't really add much for the buck,...maybe NOS,...is there anything else. someone suggested the apex itc ( timing control ). What is the correction factor to see what the crank hp is??
Follow Ups	Just under 300hp for NA??? HOW - gls22 11:01:32 11/28/01 NOS is the only way. (n/m) - Brian(IL) 11:05:29 11/28/01 If you spray, then headders help some...not allot tho. (n/m) - Mal1ce 11:09:16 11/28/01 Today I'm doing Exhaust, Intake, (ECU maybe) - F8IZHIS 11:12:43 11/28/01 He probly ment 300 Crank - haz0rd 11:33:13 11/28/01 pistons?!??!? how?? 11.0+/1 comression? (n/m) - HaloZ² 11:42:22 11/28/01 umm 96's sux. i had 193 with an intake and fly . - HaloZ² 11:40:46 11/28/01 What was that. Slap slap! (n/m) - Mike (La Canada) 12:55:25 11/28/01 u just have a freak car. (n/m) - HaloZ² 13:16:09 11/28/01 Yeah baby! Nobody else follows my lead though. Weird (n/m) - Mike (La Canada) 13:17:55 11/28/01 cuz for some reason your 96 take to mods a lot better - HaloZ² 13:21:04 11/28/01 But we can all agree the 96' 2+2 is the >>> - [-TRM in TPA-] 13:34:14 11/28/01 only the HOE ones , i mean red auto ones. (n/m) - HaloZ² 13:59:01 11/28/01 I disagree >>>> - 96-2+2TT(NYC) 20:29:21 11/28/01 it's an inside joke about a local person (n/m) - HaloZ² 21:28:04 11/28/01 ***Raises Hand*** --> - ZFreak (Scott) 12:44:56 11/28/01 His mods were LSD the boy was hallucinating (n/m) - RT 14:20:59 11/28/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.